Monday, November 13, 2017

Smoke Gets In Your Eyes: When Romance Ruins an Adventure Novel

Romance -- never really been my thing.
I'll just admit that now.

I'd much rather read an epic fantasy than Cupid's target practice.  

Now I know what you're going to say: "BUT GRACE, JANE AUSTEN AND THE BRONTE SISTERS ARE LISTED AMONG YOUR FAVORITE BOOKS!  You do know the definition of a romance novel...right?"

Yes, I do.  And I don't hate ALL romance, but the stuff I do like doesn't rely on romance alone, and while the plot might have love as a central theme, there are a myriad of other things about it that make it an enjoyable read, such as social commentary or deep, multi-faceted characters.

For example: Pride and Prejudice explores the attitudes surrounding different social classes, the way they view each other, and the plight of women during an era where they could not inherit land or money.  Wuthering Heights examines the unpredictable mind of a young man mistreated by his family, who is forced to grow into his own independence.


So when romance meets adventure, does it hurt the story, or add to it?

Answer: YES




Okay, okay, fine.  I'll tell you what I mean.

Romance raises the stakes.
When you're fighting to defend someone you love instead of a random mass of people, you're going to fight harder.  That's the reasoning behind "if you don't tell me what I want to know, she dies", when the villain kidnaps the hero's girlfriend, and plenty of other cliche situations.  This puts the protagonist in a bit of a tight spot, because they're forced to choose between saving the love of their life (or two weeks, depending on our protagonist), or the rest of civilization.

When you're fighting alongside someone you love, you're going to want to impress and protect them simultaneously, which puts you in some very strange situations that would not have happened if you'd been fighting alone, being cautious, and generally keeping your head about you.  On the other hand, I can name plenty of protagonists who could use someone to hold them back by their hoodie before doing something that could jeopardize the entire plot.


There's also a fantastic opportunity for lots of hilarious bickering.  Which I love.


On the other hand, romance is a huge distraction.
There are so many great examples of this, and it's probably one of my biggest pet peeves.  I very rarely get excited about romance in stories in general (yes, even Jane Austen), usually I just want people to have some common sense for crying out loud, so when you add, say, a WAR THEY SHOULD BE FIGHTING, I get a little frustrated.

Just a little.

In case you hadn't noticed.

SERIOUSLY, IF THIS DISTRACTION DID NOT EXIST, BOOKS WOULD BE OVER IN HALF THE TIME BECAUSE THEY'D ACTUALLY BE FIGHTING THE WAR, DANGIT!


And honestly, since romance feels like an extra in adventure/action genres anyway, I feel like the drama is often used as a filler when the author can't actually think of anything else that could possibly happen, and they can't end the story yet, because it's not long enough!*



*I might be guilty of doing this ONCE.  ONE TIME.  And they were mostly fighting, and the main character didn't want to save the world ANYWAY, and the girl was mad at him for it, so it was JUSTIFIED, people.  JUSTIFIED.


Very often, the romance is directed towards the wrong person.
Just look at any tall, dark, mysterious, "bad boy" love interest.  Seriously.  Talk about emotional manipulation.  Most of the time they're the most narcissistic jerks the planet has to offer.  The only reason they look like a half decent person is because they're being compared to the villain. 

So, you know, they might be verbally abusive, controlling, self-centered, cheating, and completely and utterly void of all empathy, but at least they're not trying to take over the world and and introduce a totalitarian order!  THAT JUST FIXES EVERYTHING INSTANTLY!




So I'm sure you're all waiting for me to tell you how you're SUPPOSED to write romance.
Hahahahahahahaha you probably just want me to shut up because I haven't posted in a century and now I'm back and shouting opinions in your face.  

Honestly, the problem with writing and being an author is that one group of people is totally there for the kissing-instead-of-shooting-people, and then people like me are screaming at the pages, or TV, or whatever, and immensely frustrated because we just want explosions and epic fight scenes and to envy whatever cool tech the lead guy is using.

I need a leather jacket, massive glowing space guns, and an epic soundtrack.  Your main character is clearly too busy kissing to use such things for their intended purposes, so hand them over here and I will use them.  Thank you.


So: 
Don't cheat and use random romantic scenes to fill your novel because you ran out of plot.  Make sure that if you have romance, it's there for a reason and a purpose that fits with your characters, and what they're trying to achieve.  If they REALLY ARE stupid enough to get distracted then....well sorry, can't help you, I think you need better characters, because WHO the HECK picks SUCH PEOPLE to SAVE the FREAKING UNIVERSE!  IT'S JUST THE UNIVERSE.  NO BIG DEAL.



I don't even know if that was helpful or not, I was honestly just ranting by the end.  Do you have any romance pet peeves?  Is there anything that makes it better?  Makes it worse?  Let me know in the comments.










Thursday, October 19, 2017

You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Mentor's Death

Mentors.  They die a lot.

Seriously.

Like, all the time.

It should probably be in their contract at this point.

In fact, this is such a common trope that everyone, not just crazy book nerds, is completely aware of it and probably just as tired of all the injustice inflicted on the poor teachers/father figures/etc.

SO WHY DOES IT HAPPEN??

1. It starts the hero on their journey.
Anyone with any life experience will tell you that once you hit a certain point in your life, you have to do things on your own.  You can't rely on your parents or guardians to do it for you.  You need to make decisions that affect the rest of your future, and it can be scary.  But because you're making your own choices, you have the ability to learn and grow from things that may not have affected you when you were younger.

The same is true with the protagonist of a story.  In order for them to grow as a person, they need a shove in the direction of independence.  Taking what they've learned from their mentor, they need something to force them out on their own and complete the quest they were given.  Because they're doing it all by themselves, they have one to fall back on when consequences knock on their door.  Friends and companions might certainly play a role in the story, but they won't be the same solid wall of support and advice that the main character may have had.

See, the thing is, if any of us were given the choice, I don't think we'd choose complete independence unless we were in a situation that seemed worse than even the hardest parts of adulting.  The same is true with the hero of a story.  Chances are, they don't actually want to do a difficult quest that will permanently alter them as a person, even if they like adventures.  So ripping the rug out from under their feet is usually the easiest way to go.



2. It's an easy way to manipulate emotions.
Everyone knows that writers love to make people cry.  It's because we feed off your tears I MEAN IT'S BECAUSE WE ARE WONDERFUL PEOPLE WHO REASSURE YOU THAT YOU IN FACT DO HAVE FEELINGS AND ARE NOT A VULCAN POTATO.  The mentor usually means a lot to the hero, even if they weren't the best person on the planet, and depending on the story, they were probably the closest thing the hero had to a parent.  

This means that when that person is gone, better yet if they die a tragic death, the hero is left to mourn them. When this is done well, there's nothing wrong it.  The problem arises when it's so over-used that there's really no emotions associated with it anymore.  Everyone knows the mentor is going to die, so there's no impact when it actually happens.



There's got to be other ways to do this, right?
I certainly hope so.  What if the mentor went along on the quest?  What if they survived?  This would change the story, but maybe it would be for the better.  Think about how switching up this trope would affect the plot.  I bet having an experienced warrior along would be useful.  They could always pull a Gandalf and have other things they have to do while your hero goes on their adventure.  I mean, if your protagonist is trying to save all that is good in the world, I'm sure it would be handy to have people in two different places.

If you don't want the mentor to go along on the quest, give them a valid reason that doesn't involve their death.  Maybe they have a disability, a war wound, arthritis, the list goes on.  There's a lot of things that can keep someone in their house.  The older they are the easier this gets.  Seriously, arthritis in your knees is a perfectly valid excuse to stay home.  I can imagine it would make a long quest difficult, never mind fighting, riding a horse, etc.  If they fought in a war or experienced anything traumatic, PTSD can dramatically and permanently alter their mental state.  Just make sure you do your research.  


Are there situations where it's okay to kill them?
Absolutely.  In the original Star Wars series, Yoda was REALLY REALLY OLD.  Like, REALLY OLD.  It was totally okay for him to die after training Luke.  It was obviously convenient timing, but still.


Don't kill your mentor character just because you can, there should be a valid reason for it.  And that valid reason should not be "the main character needs a reason to leave", because there have GOT to be other ways to pressure the hero into getting the heck out of their little village and off to a quest.  If you have a mentor with already obvious health issues, it might be alright to have them die of natural causes.  

In reality, this is a difficult trope to handle because on one hand, the mentor dying might be a good thing for your character, but on the other hand, it's so overused that it's just going to be another trope.  If there really is no other option then go ahead, but explore other ideas first.

On that note, what if a hero left of their own free will and of the prompting of their mentor, and started off with confidence instead of a completely broken life?  It would be an interesting character arc, since instead of starting off a mess, they would realize over time that life isn't as easy as they thought it would be, and they'd have to overcome their dreams being crushed as they go.

Good times.


So what about you guys?  Is there anything about the mentor's death that you think I missed?  What ideas do you have for working around this trope?  I'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments.


The rest of the series:
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Resurrected Character
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Strong Female Lead
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Universal Language
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Superior Race
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Chosen One
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Redemption Arc







Monday, October 16, 2017

Rewriting and Rough Drafts: They're Important!

WHAT!  GRACE IS WRITING A BLOG POST!??!!?!?!!??

Yeah, hey guys.  So I promise I haven't dropped off the face of the earth, I've just dropped off the face of inspiration because I've been doing a lot of writing for one class, and the other is Latin 101 ('nough said).

I also tried to make a strict blogging plot for the next few months and ended up trying to force myself to write about things I'm not actually interested in, which was a mistake and completely turned me off to blogging for a little while. That's entirely my fault.

So, with NaNoWriMo fast approaching, I thought I'd do a post about rewriting your stories, and why it's okay for rough drafts to be completely horrible and the worst thing you've written since the age of five.

Yep!  Planning, writing, rewriting, screaming into the void, it's all part of the process.  I personally have always disliked the thought of rewriting, or rather, been afraid of it, and I've just recently learned exactly how bad a rough draft is allowed to be.  So now I'm gonna talk about it, because that's the natural order of things, apparently.

Read on for random things I've learned about the writing process that should be old hat to all of us...but no.


The first rough draft is SUPPOSED to be bad.
In fact, I don't even call them rough drafts much anymore.  I refer to my first draft as a vomit draft.  Yep.  Lovely imagery there.  But seriously, its true.  I can be a bit of a perfectionist when it comes to my stories, so it took a while for me to pick this up.  Your rough draft can be the worst thing on the planet, and when you're done writing it, it is perfectly acceptable to wish for its instant demise.

See, the thing with rough drafts is they aren't really sure what they want to be yet.  You've got the idea for your story, and maybe a plot, and maybe some character development, but when you begin to actually write, you might realize that it's not going the way you thought it might originally.  You might come up with a better idea halfway through the book, or you might realize that a certain character isn't at all what you first thought he was going to be.


So basically: Rough drafts can be the worst, the most nonsensical, incongruous crap ever written.  The only thing that matters at this stage is that you WRITE DOWN THE STORY.  Everything else is details. 


It's okay to deviate from your original plot.
I do it all the time!  Like I said earlier, plotting a story and actually writing it are two completely different creatures, and you might realize that your carefully made and meticulous outline won't work with your characters, or there's a HUGE GAPING PLOT HOLE you didn't plan for.  Or one of your characters decides that they're NOT ACTUALLY GOING TO SAVE THE WORLD, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A CRISIS AND LEAVE THEIR ROOMMATE TO DO IT.  ORION NEVER ASKED FOR THIS JAMES, PULL YOURSELF TOGETHER! 

*clears throat*

AS I WAS SAYING.
Let your story meander and change as you go.  Be flexible!  It's a first draft!  You might come across a gem of a plot point that you would never have discovered if you'd kept closely to your written outline.  Leave future drafts for polishing and making sense.  


That being said, keep that plot around.  DO! NOT! DELETE! THE! PLOT!  You will hate yourself later if you do, I promise.  Keep that notebook, or document, or file, or whatever you have it saved on, because it will absolutely come in handy in the future.  


Don't be afraid of things changing in your rewrite.
I'll be honest, this is difficult for me.  There are so many scenes in the story I'm working on now that I absolutely love, and I'm afraid that if I rewrite the story, they won't make it in.  But you know what? That's okay!  I'll still have my rough draft saved on my computer, it's not like it'll be gone forever, and I can always use it as a reference or add stuff in later.  And anyway, you'll probably end up writing lots of wonderful things in your second draft.  It might even be better (correction: it WILL be better), because this time around you'll be more familiar with your plot, characters, and where you really want the story to go, since you got all your word spews out in the first draft and now you have all that lovely material to work with!  Which isn't remotely overwhelming!



You'll have a better grasp on your plot and characters each time you write.
The more time you spend with your story, the more predictable your characters become to you, and the easier it becomes to write them.  Instead of one of them randomly deciding he doesn't want to save the world (yes, I'm still salty about my character's badly-timed emotional meltdown), you can give them the initiative you know they need to still want to do it (for James: the destruction of his guitar).

You'll also be more comfortable with your plot.  Instead of it waddling off to eat cupcakes, it might actually start listening to you!  You'll have a better understanding of where you want it to go, and because you know your characters so much better, you'll know if anything in the plot is out of character for them, and how to fix it (no kidding, it took me like FOUR YEARS to realize that the ending of one of my stories was completely unrealistic and my snobby noblewoman would never marry a peasant).  

This will result in a much more solid story, and as your characters gain depth and your plot becomes more believable and tied-together, your novel and writing will improve.  You'll be able to focus more on details you might not think about when you're still character wrangling (it's a legit sport, I just invented it), and for all your hard work, you'll have something at the end to be proud of!



So there you have it!  And while we're on the topic, what kind of experiences have you had with rewrites and rough drafts?  Have you ever had a story run away from you and do all kinds of unexpected things without your permission?  Tell me about your wacky writing adventures in the comments.

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

What I've Been Reading -- August 2017

Hey everybody!

School's started up again for me, which means less free reading time, but because I have No Chill, I'm going to be trying to keep up this series.  In the meantime, here's the last of the summer!  It went by waaaay too quickly, and in all honestly I'm really happy to start classes again.  I need some kind of routine in my life.

We'll see how I feel about that in a few months.

So on to books:


The Winter of Our Discontent
John Steinbeck

This is a book that you have to commit to.  While the beginning had amazing character development, and the internal monologue of the main character was intriguing, you had to get to the second half of the book to really get into the action.  The first large portion of the book is all set-up.  Once it got going, though, it really moved, and the ending had me holding my breath, praying that the main character would not do the Stupid Thing.  This was a great book, and I'd recommend it to anyone who appreciates well-done internal conflict.  If you're looking for a lot of action and a fast moving story, though, this isn't the one for you.

“In poverty she is envious. In riches she may be a snob. Money does not change the sickness, only the symptoms” 

“She cared deeply about words and she hated their misuse as she would hate the clumsy handling of any fine thing.” 



A Monster Calls
Patrick Ness

I'm not really sure what I was expecting from this book.  Certainly not what I got.  It only took me an hour to read, but it was probably the best one I've read in a long time.  It might not be that way for everyone, but it helped me immensely and left me pretty shaken up.  It was intense.  While the writing style is more like something you'd find in a children's book, the subject is very heavy.  I wouldn't call it a horror story, it certainly didn't scare me, but it has strong fairy-tale elements and Ness mixed fantasy and reality in a brilliant way.  I would recommend this book to anyone, but be warned, it will make you feel things.  Even just remembering reading this book is making me emote.  It's a very crazy, but very necessary book.

“You do not write your life with words...You write it with actions. What you think is not important. It is only important what you do.” 

“Who is to say it is not everything else that is the dream?” 

“Almost like being in the nightmare, that same feverish blur of the world slipping off its axis, but this time he was the one in control, this time he was the nightmare.” 



Dracula
Bram Stoker

I read this book because I wanted to know where the idea of vampires as we think of them today came to be, and I was impressed.  The story and plot were well-constructed, the reading wasn't nearly as heavy as I'd expected, given the era in which it was written, and the characters were complex.  Not only that, but unlike most Victorian novels, this one boasted strong female characters, one in particular gaining the respect of the entire vampire hunting team.  I would recommend this book to anyone curious about the origin of our idea of vampires, and to anyone who's tired of hearing about them sparkling in the sun.

“You reason well, and your wit is bold, but you are too prejudiced. You do not let your eyes see nor your ears hear, and that which is outside your daily life is not of account to you. Do you not think that there are things which you cannot understand, and yet which are, that some people see things that others cannot?” 


Ta-da! Three of the books I've read this August.  This isn't all I've been reading, I have a huge pile of books on a table in my room that I've determined to read, so we'll see how that goes.

What have you been reading this month?  Put your book recommendations in the comments.

Thursday, August 24, 2017

Story Planning: What I've Tried and Failed At

Hey guys!

Random update about my life: I have a new laptop!  I was using a Chromebook before, which was annoying because every time I needed to use Microsoft Word or anything else that didn't use Google, I had to switch to a different computer which ran about as quickly as a turtle and was an ACTUAL ELEPHANT and completely impractical for college life.

So story planning.

As a writer, I'm supposed to plan stories.  I've tried a couple different kinds of planning, and I thought I'd share my experiences in that area.  Note that I am not a planning expert.  Just slightly organized.

Anyway if you like to read about people's failures (SHAME ON YOU), or if you're looking for ideas when it comes to planning and how each kind works outside of Pinterest (because let's face it, none of us are that perfect), keep reading.  Oh, and if you want to try one of these, please do, and let me know how it goes for you.  Everyone's different.


1. Flying by the seat of your pants.
This is what I've called planning for most of my life.  I start with a story idea, and.....

Yep.  That's basically it.

These stories normally fizzle out because my characters just end up wandering around eating pizza and talking about their problems.  I might have a rough idea as to where I want the story to go, but it will never actually get there because I don't have anything for the middle.


Oh, and the one story that did get past three or four chapters was a train wreck, the characters died without my permission, one ended up outlawed, a few got married accidentally, and the traditional mourning colors changed mid-story.  


2. Scene by scene.
Because when one thing doesn't work, you try the EXACT OPPOSITE. 

Yep, I tried to plan a story by working out every scene in detail.  I used index cards and a little index card folder, which was rather cute, but very overwhelming.  After sitting down and planning out the first few chapters, I started writing.  And then I reached the end of what I'd planned.  I knew I wasn't going to be able to keep it up, and I had to find some kind of planning that sat happily in the middle of the two extremes.  I'm sorry, super-detailed people.  Not my thing.


I also found that this gave me absolutely no wiggle room, which is very important to me.  My rough drafts are VERY rough, and I expect to make a lot of changes in the second round.  With this kind of planning I felt like I was trying to produce something final on my very first go, and it stresses me out just thinking about it.


3. The rough outline.
This is the one I started out on with the story I'm writing at the moment.  I had a beginning, a middle, and an end.  It was written down (not just floating around in my head), and I knew where I was going with the story.  The problem?  If I were to write the story based solely on what I had, there would be exactly three chapters.  Three rather short chapters.  That's not a novel.  I had to find filler of SOME SORT, and it had to actually add to the story.  

Which is how my main character ended up following a toddler around New York City, getting into a massive argument with said toddler's older sister, having a huge existential crisis, and ruining the ending I had planned by dropping out of the story.




So what am I going to try next?  Chapter by chapter.

Yep.  I'm gonna take my story, divide it by chapter, and figure out what I want to happen in each one.  This is less detailed than scene-by-scene planning, but my characters won't be wandering aimlessly through NYC, eating pizza, or dying unexpectedly.  It'll also be easier for me to keep them in character, as I'll have a set goal for each of them in mind.  

So what do you think?  Do you have a planning style that works for you?  Have you tried one of these?  Let me know in the comments!

Thursday, July 13, 2017

You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Resurrected Character

Hello lovelies!

I AM NOT DEAD!
I don't know what happened, honestly.  Blogging just....hasn't been a thing.  I didn't post a thing for ages.  The end of this month will have a "what I've been reading" though, because I went and got ten books from the library two weeks before the start of the school year because I AM COMPLETELY SANE.



So going with the "not dead" theme, RESURRECTED CHARACTERS!

Seriously though.  These are everywhere.  And I mean everywhere.  Here's a helpful list.  Spoilers, obviously.

The Lord of the Rings -- Gandalf
The Avengers -- Agent Coulson, Loki
The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes -- Sherlock Holmes
Harry Potter -- Voldemort, Harry Potter
Doctor Who -- Jack Harkness, The Doctor, the Daleks, the Master, various other aliens.

And those are just off the top of my head.

In other words, at this point I just assume that a character could come back.  I'm not in denial, I've just had experience.  Especially if they die early on in the book, movie, series, what have you.

Now don't get me wrong, bringing a character back to life can have some awesome side effects and shouldn't be ignored.  In The Lord of the Rings, Gandalf's return was fantastic and probably one of the best resurrections out there.  And if Voldemort hadn't come back to life after trying to kill Harry, the entire series wouldn't exist.  But this is insanely over-used.  I mean to the point where we should just make everyone immortal because THEY CAN'T FREAKING STAY DEAD ANYWAY!


So I'm going to try to create a helpful list for why this is annoying, and then try and mention some times when it's okay to bring your character back to life.


1. Eventually, no one believes you anymore
So you know the story of the boy who cried wolf?  Yeah.  Same deal here.  After you've done this once, people start hoping their favorite character isn't really gone.  Do this twice, people start assuming recently killed characters aren't actually gone forever.  Any more, and you've basically doomed the entire cast to immortality.  It completely looses it's effect.


Now in the case of Gandalf's resurrection, it was a one-time thing, and Gandalf was already basically immortal.  I mean he'd been around about as long as the elves, so it's safe to assume he's really hard to kill in the first place.  Plus, none of the other characters pulled that stunt, or had pulled it up to that point, so you know, it was pretty important.   A long enough span of time lapsed between him dying and him coming back to life that we had the chance to be sad for him and get over it somewhat, which means we weren't expecting him when he did arrive, and when that finally happened, he'd clearly "leveled up", and wasn't just good ol' Gandalf, being a silly old wizard again.


2. No one is impacted by the death of a character.
In Doctor Who, the only reason people cry when the Doctor regenerates is because they had a personal attachment to his old face.  We're not sad because he's dying, because we know he's not really dying, he's changing.  In The Avengers, Loki's died often enough that people aren't going to cry the next time it happens, even if he really is genuinely and permanently dead, because they won't believe it.  Of course when it finally sinks in, lots of people will be devastated.  Because Sherlock came back from the dead, there are lots of people who watch BBC's TV version who firmly believe that Moriarty and Mary are still alive somewhere.  This is also because the show is written by Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat and to be perfectly honest, I wouldn't trust them with any character or plotline.  They're known for ruining souls.




3. The explanation behind the resurrection can be very poorly done.
If a character is brought back to life purely because the writer felt like bringing him back around or because the fan base demanded it, there's often only a half-baked idea behind their return.  I mean, I'm one of those people who gets frustrated when there isn't a thorough scientific explanation for everything (Doctor Who is exasperating), so I'm never satisfied with a "just because".  I always have to look deeper and investigate the reasons behind the "just because", until you can't throw that excuse around anymore.  That being said, I'm often fairly peeved when a character comes back to life without a decently researched and well-grounded reason.




So when is it okay for your character to come back to life?

1. Doctor Who
Regeneration is a part of a Time Lord's biology, and it's something everyone in their race does (unless there's some minor detail I'm missing and there's like one person on Gallifrey who can't).  Therefore, it's not a surprise and it's not weird.  The Master is also a Time Lord, so regeneration isn't strange for him either.  Not only that, but because The Doctor changes a little every time he regenerates, it's less like him coming back to life....AGAIN, and more like him rebooting.  In fact, he doesn't really die, because the regeneration energy keeps him from doing that.  That's it's exact purpose.


Because regeneration is a part of his character and his race from the very beginning, it's less like cheating when he comes back to life for the twelfth or thirteenth time in a row. 


2. The Harry Potter series.
Voldemort had horcruxes, or things that hold a part of your soul for you so that while it's still intact, you can't fully die.  He picked pretty obvious horcruxes and made some very poor decisions in that respect, but he still couldn't die until they were all destroyed.  Next time pick something like a penny Voldemort.  Or maybe like, a Nokia phone or a single grain of sand.  NOT A FREAKING TIARA. Or, I WONDER WHERE VOLDY'S HORCRUXES ARE.  GOSH THAT SNAKE IS WITH HIM CONSTANTLY.  HE'S LIKE, BESTIES WITH THAT SNAKE.  SURE CAN'T FIND ANY HORCRUXES.  

I mean in his defense, there's a reason why Harry wasn't put in Hufflepuff.  He's not a particularly good finder.  

Back to not dying, when Voldemort killed Harry Potter in the final book, Harry is sent to a kind of limbo area between the world of the living and the dead.  There he meets Dumbledore, who allows him to go back to complete his task of killing Voldemort.  After that he continues living a normal and pretty happy life.  In this situation, we actually see what happens to Harry after he dies and see that he is allowed to return to finish what he was chosen to do, so his return isn't exactly cheesy, and because we see how it happens, we get background and an explanation.  (Although sometimes I wonder if Neville, who technically could have also been the Chosen One, couldn't have just finished the prophecy.  That would have been cool.)  




BUT ANYWAY

There's the blog post.  Sorry that took exactly 100 years, guys.  I was also tagged in a writing prompt post like ages and ages ago and have I done anything about that?  OF COURSE NOT! Although I have an idea and things are spinning about in my head.  

Let me know what you think about characters coming back to life!  Do you still cry if they've already died ten times, or are you like me and you just assume they're not really dead?


The rest of the series:
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Strong Female Lead
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Universal Language
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Superior Race
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Chosen One
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Redemption Arc
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Love Triangle






Sunday, July 2, 2017

What I've Been Reading -- June 2017

Hey everybody!
I've been a bit quiet, and I'm not sure why.  My blogging mind has taken a nap, I suppose.  Plus, Blogger has been stubborn about saving posts, so a lovely thing I'd written up has entirely disappeared because I didn't realize it didn't save.  However, I've been tagged in a post so you should see something soon!  In the meantime, here are a few of the books I've been reading this month.




The Princess Bride
William Goldman

I grew up with the movie, but I didn't know there was a book until a friend of mine said she'd read it.  It's much better than the movie, with a lot more backstory and scenes the movie couldn't include, but I found that a lot of scenes in the movie were taken verbatim from the book, which made me happy.  The book begins a little oddly and I was confused at first, but after getting a few chapters in things began to make sense.  I loved it, and would recommend it to basically anyone.

“Inconceivable!"
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.” 

“I’ll tell you the truth and its up to you to live with it.” 

“When this is over we will see who is right, and who is dead.” 




Where the Woods Grow Wild
Nate Philbrick

I borrowed this book from Faith, and when I started reading I thought "well, there's some epic-fantasy style stuff in here, but it sounds like a sweet story about a boy and a girl".  And then it got intense.  There were character twists, all kinds of unreliability, and they were so close to finishing the story so many times, BUT NO, one of them takes the wrong path or follows the wrong clue and they're off again.  There was a delightfully happy ending, and although I was a little disappointed because my evil mind thought one of the characters could be A LOT darker than she was written, I was satisfied, and it was nice to read something light.  It actually reminded me a bit of The Princess Bride, although I wouldn't say they were the same book by any means.  I'd recommend this book to anyone, and to a very broad age range.




Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency
Douglas Adams

Douglas Adams is one of my favorite authors of all time, and The Hitchhiker's Guide series is fantastic, so I was looking forward to reading this book.  It started out a little slow, but Adams' signature weirdness was there the whole time, and the story picked up during the second half of the book.  The characters were quirky and strange, and the plot made about as much sense as I expected from one of his books.  I loved it, and might look into the rest of the series at some point.  I'd recommend it to someone who's familiar with his style, but I wouldn't call it the book to read to be introduced to him as an author.

“There is no point in using the word 'impossible' to describe something that has clearly happened.” 

“He turned slowly like a fridge door opening.” 

“I commend you on your skepticism, but even the skeptical mind must be prepared to accept the unacceptable when there is no alternative. If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidæ on our hands.”

 “Deep in the rain forest it was doing what it usually does in rain forests, which was raining: hence the name.” 

“The sky which had started out with such verve and spirit in the morning was beginning to lose its concentration and slip back into its normal English condition, that of a damp and rancid dish cloth.” 

“He put some more cold pizza into his face.” 



Ta-Da!  My books.  Sorry this is a day or two late, I had friends over this week so blogging didn't really happen.  The next few posts should be one I've been tagged in by the same Faith who let me borrow her book, and another installment of "You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your ______".  Not sure when exactly they'll be going up, but they will be at some point.

Friday, June 9, 2017

Problems Introverted Writers Have to Deal With

HELLOOOOOOO!!!!!
I get really excited every time I begin a post and have no idea why.
HELLO TO THE PEOPLE!

Anyway
I just got back from the ocean!  It was awesome and ocean-y.

So introverts.
We all know at least one.
I am one.
As an introverted writer, there are things that do not come easily for me.  I'm going to list them and cross my fingers and hope and pray that I'm not the only one who has these struggles.  FEEL MY PAIN WITH ME!  I DEMAND IT.

I don't.  Be happy and make some cupcakes.  Send me some, and I might be your friend forever.


1. Gathering character information.
Google is a gift to humanity, but it can only do so much.  There are times when you must speak to an actual human to gather information on a certain character.  And not only must you talk to them, you must initiate a conversation and not bore then to death or take up their precious time or bother them with your questions or put them to sleep with the story idea that you think is really interesting but they must be so bored by now.  Talking to people is HARD.  It's REALLY REALLY HARD.  And as a writer, YOU HAVE TO DO IT!

2. Sunlight and the outdoors in general.
My bedroom is in our finished basement.  It's my Hobbit-Hole, cave, den, whatever.  All you need to know is I only go up the stairs for food, a shower, and to see my family once and a while when I'm required to communicate with other life forms.  I mean, I suppose I could go write outside, but.......whyyyyyyyyyy......

In my defense, it is a REALLY AWESOME BEAR CAVE.  There are very few things which could bring me out of my bedroom.

It doesn't have to be a bedroom though.  Introverts are notorious for shutting themselves up in small, dark places.  Unless they're claustrophobic, but then they just shut themselves up in larger, lighter places.  This doesn't usually directly affect writing, but I have discovered that when I do go for a walk in the woods or spend time with friends, I feel more creative afterwards.

3. Writing workshops and conventions.
Don't get me wrong, there's something really magical about walking into a large room and seeing it filled with writers.  Knowing you're not the only person who struggles with plot development or internal conflict is fantastic.

But then there's the whole problem of it being a convention.  With other people.  Lots of other people.  And you're supposed to "hang out" with them.  And "mill about".  And "talk to them".  And "be social".  I don't know about you, but I'd much rather stay in my bed and read, even if I do end up missing out on conversations with other writers.

My mom is awesome and encourages my writing, but she's an extrovert, and her way of doing that is to tell me about all kinds of conventions and retreats I should go to.  They sound great in theory, but the more I think about them the more I realize I'd probably shut down on day two and just be trying really hard to fake excitement.

4. Writing extroverted characters.
Extroverts don't always find it easy to understand introverts, but the same is true the other way around.  Extroverts are confusing.  Are they social butterflies who are loud and outgoing at all times?  Or are they like us, just...more excited about social events?  Now I did a blog post about the care and keeping of extroverts a while back, but it's one thing to know one in real life and another thing entirely to create one.  I can understand the thought processes of an internal processing, introverted, and generally hedgehog-like character.  The bouncy, people-loving, life of the party?  Not so much.  It's hard to wrap my brain around the fact that being by yourself can drain your energy, and that someone might actually REALLY REALLY ENJOY the writing convention I decided not to attend.  They don't just to go parties because there's food, and they don't instantly make friends with the cat.  Although if you're like a certain extrovert I know, the second an animal comes into view they must talk to it for a few minutes...at least.

And when it comes to writing, well, lets just say that sending an extrovert on a solo trek across an empty desert may not go so well.  Neither would hiding out for long periods of time, or moving to a new location and not having many friends.  Although extroverts tend to remedy that pretty quickly....

SEE THIS IS WHY IT'S HARD!

5. Promoting yourself.
I don't know about you, but I'm rubbish at promoting my skills.  It involves talking to people, being the center of attention for a moment on at least a small scale, and coming up with reasons why people should focus on you.  All of which are absolute torture.  This can apply to writing, music, or anything that involves self-promotion, and it is the one thing about publishing a book that I am REALLY not looking forward to.

6. Telling people about your writing.
This kind of goes along with the last point.  While I love it when people want to hear about what I write, the fact that I actually have to tell them is...well, it's a bit intimidating.  Verbal communication has never been my strong point, which is partly why I have this blog, so when I try to talk to someone about what I've written, things go a bit pear-shaped.  I've mentioned this once or twice before in previous blog posts, but I feel like it's worth mentioning again and again.

And then, when you've been sitting there for two hours and you're only halfway through the story, you suddenly realize that you may in fact be really boring that person.  So you stop.  And then you think, but wait, should I stop?  or should I finish the story?  But that's got more to do with anxiety than introversion.




So there you have it.  I hope you can relate to this as much as I can (being as I made the list...it would be pretty sad if I made a list I couldn't actually relate to at all...).  Let me know in the comments if there's anything I missed!

Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Daily Quote Challenge (or: I'VE BEEN TAGGED IN A POST, GUYS!!!)

Hello!  It is the last day of May!  And I've been tagged in a post by the fabulous Maggie @ Maggie's Musings!  Aaaaaand I'm bending the rules.  Which is something I NEVER DO so watch out world here I come.

The Daily Quote Challenge -- What you're supposed to do.
1. Thank the person who nominated you.
2. Tag three new bloggers every day.
3. Post one quote on your blog every day for three consecutive days.

The Daily Quote Challenge -- What I'm doing.
1. Thanking the person who nominated me.
2. Tagging....some bloggers?
3. Posting a bunch of quotes here because why the heck not.


So first things first: Thank you Maggie, you amazing unicorn and generally cool person!

(this is the point in the story where Grace realizes that the steps are out of order and has a crisis because while she can completely rework the rules for the challenge she cannot follow a numbered list in the WRONG ORDER because that would be a crime to all of humanity.  THREE DOES NOT COME BEFORE TWO)

Have I ever mentioned that I'm weird?

Okay, so here are the quotes.  I'm combining this challenge with something Faith @ Genuine Perplexities did, where she described herself with various internet things.  So basically I'm posting a bunch of quotes that are important to me.





So there you have it!

Quotes that I like.  

Now to tag.

This is the problem with having a whopping total of four friends and only two of them blog.
Not only that but Maggie's already done the post, and tagged Faith.  So.  I highly doubt people will see this but here goes.  

Cait @ Paper Fury
Hannah @ Hannah Heath


And that's it.  Can I tag Faith and Maggie again? Nope.  So basically if you want to do this post, consider yourself tagged, say that I tagged you, and make the post. 

That's it!  Grace out.