Monday, October 16, 2017

Rewriting and Rough Drafts: They're Important!

WHAT!  GRACE IS WRITING A BLOG POST!??!!?!?!!??

Yeah, hey guys.  So I promise I haven't dropped off the face of the earth, I've just dropped off the face of inspiration because I've been doing a lot of writing for one class, and the other is Latin 101 ('nough said).

I also tried to make a strict blogging plot for the next few months and ended up trying to force myself to write about things I'm not actually interested in, which was a mistake and completely turned me off to blogging for a little while. That's entirely my fault.

So, with NaNoWriMo fast approaching, I thought I'd do a post about rewriting your stories, and why it's okay for rough drafts to be completely horrible and the worst thing you've written since the age of five.

Yep!  Planning, writing, rewriting, screaming into the void, it's all part of the process.  I personally have always disliked the thought of rewriting, or rather, been afraid of it, and I've just recently learned exactly how bad a rough draft is allowed to be.  So now I'm gonna talk about it, because that's the natural order of things, apparently.

Read on for random things I've learned about the writing process that should be old hat to all of us...but no.


The first rough draft is SUPPOSED to be bad.
In fact, I don't even call them rough drafts much anymore.  I refer to my first draft as a vomit draft.  Yep.  Lovely imagery there.  But seriously, its true.  I can be a bit of a perfectionist when it comes to my stories, so it took a while for me to pick this up.  Your rough draft can be the worst thing on the planet, and when you're done writing it, it is perfectly acceptable to wish for its instant demise.

See, the thing with rough drafts is they aren't really sure what they want to be yet.  You've got the idea for your story, and maybe a plot, and maybe some character development, but when you begin to actually write, you might realize that it's not going the way you thought it might originally.  You might come up with a better idea halfway through the book, or you might realize that a certain character isn't at all what you first thought he was going to be.


So basically: Rough drafts can be the worst, the most nonsensical, incongruous crap ever written.  The only thing that matters at this stage is that you WRITE DOWN THE STORY.  Everything else is details. 


It's okay to deviate from your original plot.
I do it all the time!  Like I said earlier, plotting a story and actually writing it are two completely different creatures, and you might realize that your carefully made and meticulous outline won't work with your characters, or there's a HUGE GAPING PLOT HOLE you didn't plan for.  Or one of your characters decides that they're NOT ACTUALLY GOING TO SAVE THE WORLD, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A CRISIS AND LEAVE THEIR ROOMMATE TO DO IT.  ORION NEVER ASKED FOR THIS JAMES, PULL YOURSELF TOGETHER! 

*clears throat*

AS I WAS SAYING.
Let your story meander and change as you go.  Be flexible!  It's a first draft!  You might come across a gem of a plot point that you would never have discovered if you'd kept closely to your written outline.  Leave future drafts for polishing and making sense.  


That being said, keep that plot around.  DO! NOT! DELETE! THE! PLOT!  You will hate yourself later if you do, I promise.  Keep that notebook, or document, or file, or whatever you have it saved on, because it will absolutely come in handy in the future.  


Don't be afraid of things changing in your rewrite.
I'll be honest, this is difficult for me.  There are so many scenes in the story I'm working on now that I absolutely love, and I'm afraid that if I rewrite the story, they won't make it in.  But you know what? That's okay!  I'll still have my rough draft saved on my computer, it's not like it'll be gone forever, and I can always use it as a reference or add stuff in later.  And anyway, you'll probably end up writing lots of wonderful things in your second draft.  It might even be better (correction: it WILL be better), because this time around you'll be more familiar with your plot, characters, and where you really want the story to go, since you got all your word spews out in the first draft and now you have all that lovely material to work with!  Which isn't remotely overwhelming!



You'll have a better grasp on your plot and characters each time you write.
The more time you spend with your story, the more predictable your characters become to you, and the easier it becomes to write them.  Instead of one of them randomly deciding he doesn't want to save the world (yes, I'm still salty about my character's badly-timed emotional meltdown), you can give them the initiative you know they need to still want to do it (for James: the destruction of his guitar).

You'll also be more comfortable with your plot.  Instead of it waddling off to eat cupcakes, it might actually start listening to you!  You'll have a better understanding of where you want it to go, and because you know your characters so much better, you'll know if anything in the plot is out of character for them, and how to fix it (no kidding, it took me like FOUR YEARS to realize that the ending of one of my stories was completely unrealistic and my snobby noblewoman would never marry a peasant).  

This will result in a much more solid story, and as your characters gain depth and your plot becomes more believable and tied-together, your novel and writing will improve.  You'll be able to focus more on details you might not think about when you're still character wrangling (it's a legit sport, I just invented it), and for all your hard work, you'll have something at the end to be proud of!



So there you have it!  And while we're on the topic, what kind of experiences have you had with rewrites and rough drafts?  Have you ever had a story run away from you and do all kinds of unexpected things without your permission?  Tell me about your wacky writing adventures in the comments.

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

What I've Been Reading -- August 2017

Hey everybody!

School's started up again for me, which means less free reading time, but because I have No Chill, I'm going to be trying to keep up this series.  In the meantime, here's the last of the summer!  It went by waaaay too quickly, and in all honestly I'm really happy to start classes again.  I need some kind of routine in my life.

We'll see how I feel about that in a few months.

So on to books:


The Winter of Our Discontent
John Steinbeck

This is a book that you have to commit to.  While the beginning had amazing character development, and the internal monologue of the main character was intriguing, you had to get to the second half of the book to really get into the action.  The first large portion of the book is all set-up.  Once it got going, though, it really moved, and the ending had me holding my breath, praying that the main character would not do the Stupid Thing.  This was a great book, and I'd recommend it to anyone who appreciates well-done internal conflict.  If you're looking for a lot of action and a fast moving story, though, this isn't the one for you.

“In poverty she is envious. In riches she may be a snob. Money does not change the sickness, only the symptoms” 

“She cared deeply about words and she hated their misuse as she would hate the clumsy handling of any fine thing.” 



A Monster Calls
Patrick Ness

I'm not really sure what I was expecting from this book.  Certainly not what I got.  It only took me an hour to read, but it was probably the best one I've read in a long time.  It might not be that way for everyone, but it helped me immensely and left me pretty shaken up.  It was intense.  While the writing style is more like something you'd find in a children's book, the subject is very heavy.  I wouldn't call it a horror story, it certainly didn't scare me, but it has strong fairy-tale elements and Ness mixed fantasy and reality in a brilliant way.  I would recommend this book to anyone, but be warned, it will make you feel things.  Even just remembering reading this book is making me emote.  It's a very crazy, but very necessary book.

“You do not write your life with words...You write it with actions. What you think is not important. It is only important what you do.” 

“Who is to say it is not everything else that is the dream?” 

“Almost like being in the nightmare, that same feverish blur of the world slipping off its axis, but this time he was the one in control, this time he was the nightmare.” 



Dracula
Bram Stoker

I read this book because I wanted to know where the idea of vampires as we think of them today came to be, and I was impressed.  The story and plot were well-constructed, the reading wasn't nearly as heavy as I'd expected, given the era in which it was written, and the characters were complex.  Not only that, but unlike most Victorian novels, this one boasted strong female characters, one in particular gaining the respect of the entire vampire hunting team.  I would recommend this book to anyone curious about the origin of our idea of vampires, and to anyone who's tired of hearing about them sparkling in the sun.

“You reason well, and your wit is bold, but you are too prejudiced. You do not let your eyes see nor your ears hear, and that which is outside your daily life is not of account to you. Do you not think that there are things which you cannot understand, and yet which are, that some people see things that others cannot?” 


Ta-da! Three of the books I've read this August.  This isn't all I've been reading, I have a huge pile of books on a table in my room that I've determined to read, so we'll see how that goes.

What have you been reading this month?  Put your book recommendations in the comments.

Thursday, August 24, 2017

Story Planning: What I've Tried and Failed At

Hey guys!

Random update about my life: I have a new laptop!  I was using a Chromebook before, which was annoying because every time I needed to use Microsoft Word or anything else that didn't use Google, I had to switch to a different computer which ran about as quickly as a turtle and was an ACTUAL ELEPHANT and completely impractical for college life.

So story planning.

As a writer, I'm supposed to plan stories.  I've tried a couple different kinds of planning, and I thought I'd share my experiences in that area.  Note that I am not a planning expert.  Just slightly organized.

Anyway if you like to read about people's failures (SHAME ON YOU), or if you're looking for ideas when it comes to planning and how each kind works outside of Pinterest (because let's face it, none of us are that perfect), keep reading.  Oh, and if you want to try one of these, please do, and let me know how it goes for you.  Everyone's different.


1. Flying by the seat of your pants.
This is what I've called planning for most of my life.  I start with a story idea, and.....

Yep.  That's basically it.

These stories normally fizzle out because my characters just end up wandering around eating pizza and talking about their problems.  I might have a rough idea as to where I want the story to go, but it will never actually get there because I don't have anything for the middle.


Oh, and the one story that did get past three or four chapters was a train wreck, the characters died without my permission, one ended up outlawed, a few got married accidentally, and the traditional mourning colors changed mid-story.  


2. Scene by scene.
Because when one thing doesn't work, you try the EXACT OPPOSITE. 

Yep, I tried to plan a story by working out every scene in detail.  I used index cards and a little index card folder, which was rather cute, but very overwhelming.  After sitting down and planning out the first few chapters, I started writing.  And then I reached the end of what I'd planned.  I knew I wasn't going to be able to keep it up, and I had to find some kind of planning that sat happily in the middle of the two extremes.  I'm sorry, super-detailed people.  Not my thing.


I also found that this gave me absolutely no wiggle room, which is very important to me.  My rough drafts are VERY rough, and I expect to make a lot of changes in the second round.  With this kind of planning I felt like I was trying to produce something final on my very first go, and it stresses me out just thinking about it.


3. The rough outline.
This is the one I started out on with the story I'm writing at the moment.  I had a beginning, a middle, and an end.  It was written down (not just floating around in my head), and I knew where I was going with the story.  The problem?  If I were to write the story based solely on what I had, there would be exactly three chapters.  Three rather short chapters.  That's not a novel.  I had to find filler of SOME SORT, and it had to actually add to the story.  

Which is how my main character ended up following a toddler around New York City, getting into a massive argument with said toddler's older sister, having a huge existential crisis, and ruining the ending I had planned by dropping out of the story.




So what am I going to try next?  Chapter by chapter.

Yep.  I'm gonna take my story, divide it by chapter, and figure out what I want to happen in each one.  This is less detailed than scene-by-scene planning, but my characters won't be wandering aimlessly through NYC, eating pizza, or dying unexpectedly.  It'll also be easier for me to keep them in character, as I'll have a set goal for each of them in mind.  

So what do you think?  Do you have a planning style that works for you?  Have you tried one of these?  Let me know in the comments!

Thursday, July 13, 2017

You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Resurrected Character

Hello lovelies!

I AM NOT DEAD!
I don't know what happened, honestly.  Blogging just....hasn't been a thing.  I didn't post a thing for ages.  The end of this month will have a "what I've been reading" though, because I went and got ten books from the library two weeks before the start of the school year because I AM COMPLETELY SANE.



So going with the "not dead" theme, RESURRECTED CHARACTERS!

Seriously though.  These are everywhere.  And I mean everywhere.  Here's a helpful list.  Spoilers, obviously.

The Lord of the Rings -- Gandalf
The Avengers -- Agent Coulson, Loki
The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes -- Sherlock Holmes
Harry Potter -- Voldemort, Harry Potter
Doctor Who -- Jack Harkness, The Doctor, the Daleks, the Master, various other aliens.

And those are just off the top of my head.

In other words, at this point I just assume that a character could come back.  I'm not in denial, I've just had experience.  Especially if they die early on in the book, movie, series, what have you.

Now don't get me wrong, bringing a character back to life can have some awesome side effects and shouldn't be ignored.  In The Lord of the Rings, Gandalf's return was fantastic and probably one of the best resurrections out there.  And if Voldemort hadn't come back to life after trying to kill Harry, the entire series wouldn't exist.  But this is insanely over-used.  I mean to the point where we should just make everyone immortal because THEY CAN'T FREAKING STAY DEAD ANYWAY!


So I'm going to try to create a helpful list for why this is annoying, and then try and mention some times when it's okay to bring your character back to life.


1. Eventually, no one believes you anymore
So you know the story of the boy who cried wolf?  Yeah.  Same deal here.  After you've done this once, people start hoping their favorite character isn't really gone.  Do this twice, people start assuming recently killed characters aren't actually gone forever.  Any more, and you've basically doomed the entire cast to immortality.  It completely looses it's effect.


Now in the case of Gandalf's resurrection, it was a one-time thing, and Gandalf was already basically immortal.  I mean he'd been around about as long as the elves, so it's safe to assume he's really hard to kill in the first place.  Plus, none of the other characters pulled that stunt, or had pulled it up to that point, so you know, it was pretty important.   A long enough span of time lapsed between him dying and him coming back to life that we had the chance to be sad for him and get over it somewhat, which means we weren't expecting him when he did arrive, and when that finally happened, he'd clearly "leveled up", and wasn't just good ol' Gandalf, being a silly old wizard again.


2. No one is impacted by the death of a character.
In Doctor Who, the only reason people cry when the Doctor regenerates is because they had a personal attachment to his old face.  We're not sad because he's dying, because we know he's not really dying, he's changing.  In The Avengers, Loki's died often enough that people aren't going to cry the next time it happens, even if he really is genuinely and permanently dead, because they won't believe it.  Of course when it finally sinks in, lots of people will be devastated.  Because Sherlock came back from the dead, there are lots of people who watch BBC's TV version who firmly believe that Moriarty and Mary are still alive somewhere.  This is also because the show is written by Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat and to be perfectly honest, I wouldn't trust them with any character or plotline.  They're known for ruining souls.




3. The explanation behind the resurrection can be very poorly done.
If a character is brought back to life purely because the writer felt like bringing him back around or because the fan base demanded it, there's often only a half-baked idea behind their return.  I mean, I'm one of those people who gets frustrated when there isn't a thorough scientific explanation for everything (Doctor Who is exasperating), so I'm never satisfied with a "just because".  I always have to look deeper and investigate the reasons behind the "just because", until you can't throw that excuse around anymore.  That being said, I'm often fairly peeved when a character comes back to life without a decently researched and well-grounded reason.




So when is it okay for your character to come back to life?

1. Doctor Who
Regeneration is a part of a Time Lord's biology, and it's something everyone in their race does (unless there's some minor detail I'm missing and there's like one person on Gallifrey who can't).  Therefore, it's not a surprise and it's not weird.  The Master is also a Time Lord, so regeneration isn't strange for him either.  Not only that, but because The Doctor changes a little every time he regenerates, it's less like him coming back to life....AGAIN, and more like him rebooting.  In fact, he doesn't really die, because the regeneration energy keeps him from doing that.  That's it's exact purpose.


Because regeneration is a part of his character and his race from the very beginning, it's less like cheating when he comes back to life for the twelfth or thirteenth time in a row. 


2. The Harry Potter series.
Voldemort had horcruxes, or things that hold a part of your soul for you so that while it's still intact, you can't fully die.  He picked pretty obvious horcruxes and made some very poor decisions in that respect, but he still couldn't die until they were all destroyed.  Next time pick something like a penny Voldemort.  Or maybe like, a Nokia phone or a single grain of sand.  NOT A FREAKING TIARA. Or, I WONDER WHERE VOLDY'S HORCRUXES ARE.  GOSH THAT SNAKE IS WITH HIM CONSTANTLY.  HE'S LIKE, BESTIES WITH THAT SNAKE.  SURE CAN'T FIND ANY HORCRUXES.  

I mean in his defense, there's a reason why Harry wasn't put in Hufflepuff.  He's not a particularly good finder.  

Back to not dying, when Voldemort killed Harry Potter in the final book, Harry is sent to a kind of limbo area between the world of the living and the dead.  There he meets Dumbledore, who allows him to go back to complete his task of killing Voldemort.  After that he continues living a normal and pretty happy life.  In this situation, we actually see what happens to Harry after he dies and see that he is allowed to return to finish what he was chosen to do, so his return isn't exactly cheesy, and because we see how it happens, we get background and an explanation.  (Although sometimes I wonder if Neville, who technically could have also been the Chosen One, couldn't have just finished the prophecy.  That would have been cool.)  




BUT ANYWAY

There's the blog post.  Sorry that took exactly 100 years, guys.  I was also tagged in a writing prompt post like ages and ages ago and have I done anything about that?  OF COURSE NOT! Although I have an idea and things are spinning about in my head.  

Let me know what you think about characters coming back to life!  Do you still cry if they've already died ten times, or are you like me and you just assume they're not really dead?


The rest of the series:
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Strong Female Lead
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Universal Language
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Superior Race
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Chosen One
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Redemption Arc
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Love Triangle






Sunday, July 2, 2017

What I've Been Reading -- June 2017

Hey everybody!
I've been a bit quiet, and I'm not sure why.  My blogging mind has taken a nap, I suppose.  Plus, Blogger has been stubborn about saving posts, so a lovely thing I'd written up has entirely disappeared because I didn't realize it didn't save.  However, I've been tagged in a post so you should see something soon!  In the meantime, here are a few of the books I've been reading this month.




The Princess Bride
William Goldman

I grew up with the movie, but I didn't know there was a book until a friend of mine said she'd read it.  It's much better than the movie, with a lot more backstory and scenes the movie couldn't include, but I found that a lot of scenes in the movie were taken verbatim from the book, which made me happy.  The book begins a little oddly and I was confused at first, but after getting a few chapters in things began to make sense.  I loved it, and would recommend it to basically anyone.

“Inconceivable!"
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.” 

“I’ll tell you the truth and its up to you to live with it.” 

“When this is over we will see who is right, and who is dead.” 




Where the Woods Grow Wild
Nate Philbrick

I borrowed this book from Faith, and when I started reading I thought "well, there's some epic-fantasy style stuff in here, but it sounds like a sweet story about a boy and a girl".  And then it got intense.  There were character twists, all kinds of unreliability, and they were so close to finishing the story so many times, BUT NO, one of them takes the wrong path or follows the wrong clue and they're off again.  There was a delightfully happy ending, and although I was a little disappointed because my evil mind thought one of the characters could be A LOT darker than she was written, I was satisfied, and it was nice to read something light.  It actually reminded me a bit of The Princess Bride, although I wouldn't say they were the same book by any means.  I'd recommend this book to anyone, and to a very broad age range.




Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency
Douglas Adams

Douglas Adams is one of my favorite authors of all time, and The Hitchhiker's Guide series is fantastic, so I was looking forward to reading this book.  It started out a little slow, but Adams' signature weirdness was there the whole time, and the story picked up during the second half of the book.  The characters were quirky and strange, and the plot made about as much sense as I expected from one of his books.  I loved it, and might look into the rest of the series at some point.  I'd recommend it to someone who's familiar with his style, but I wouldn't call it the book to read to be introduced to him as an author.

“There is no point in using the word 'impossible' to describe something that has clearly happened.” 

“He turned slowly like a fridge door opening.” 

“I commend you on your skepticism, but even the skeptical mind must be prepared to accept the unacceptable when there is no alternative. If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidæ on our hands.”

 “Deep in the rain forest it was doing what it usually does in rain forests, which was raining: hence the name.” 

“The sky which had started out with such verve and spirit in the morning was beginning to lose its concentration and slip back into its normal English condition, that of a damp and rancid dish cloth.” 

“He put some more cold pizza into his face.” 



Ta-Da!  My books.  Sorry this is a day or two late, I had friends over this week so blogging didn't really happen.  The next few posts should be one I've been tagged in by the same Faith who let me borrow her book, and another installment of "You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your ______".  Not sure when exactly they'll be going up, but they will be at some point.

Friday, June 9, 2017

Problems Introverted Writers Have to Deal With

HELLOOOOOOO!!!!!
I get really excited every time I begin a post and have no idea why.
HELLO TO THE PEOPLE!

Anyway
I just got back from the ocean!  It was awesome and ocean-y.

So introverts.
We all know at least one.
I am one.
As an introverted writer, there are things that do not come easily for me.  I'm going to list them and cross my fingers and hope and pray that I'm not the only one who has these struggles.  FEEL MY PAIN WITH ME!  I DEMAND IT.

I don't.  Be happy and make some cupcakes.  Send me some, and I might be your friend forever.


1. Gathering character information.
Google is a gift to humanity, but it can only do so much.  There are times when you must speak to an actual human to gather information on a certain character.  And not only must you talk to them, you must initiate a conversation and not bore then to death or take up their precious time or bother them with your questions or put them to sleep with the story idea that you think is really interesting but they must be so bored by now.  Talking to people is HARD.  It's REALLY REALLY HARD.  And as a writer, YOU HAVE TO DO IT!

2. Sunlight and the outdoors in general.
My bedroom is in our finished basement.  It's my Hobbit-Hole, cave, den, whatever.  All you need to know is I only go up the stairs for food, a shower, and to see my family once and a while when I'm required to communicate with other life forms.  I mean, I suppose I could go write outside, but.......whyyyyyyyyyy......

In my defense, it is a REALLY AWESOME BEAR CAVE.  There are very few things which could bring me out of my bedroom.

It doesn't have to be a bedroom though.  Introverts are notorious for shutting themselves up in small, dark places.  Unless they're claustrophobic, but then they just shut themselves up in larger, lighter places.  This doesn't usually directly affect writing, but I have discovered that when I do go for a walk in the woods or spend time with friends, I feel more creative afterwards.

3. Writing workshops and conventions.
Don't get me wrong, there's something really magical about walking into a large room and seeing it filled with writers.  Knowing you're not the only person who struggles with plot development or internal conflict is fantastic.

But then there's the whole problem of it being a convention.  With other people.  Lots of other people.  And you're supposed to "hang out" with them.  And "mill about".  And "talk to them".  And "be social".  I don't know about you, but I'd much rather stay in my bed and read, even if I do end up missing out on conversations with other writers.

My mom is awesome and encourages my writing, but she's an extrovert, and her way of doing that is to tell me about all kinds of conventions and retreats I should go to.  They sound great in theory, but the more I think about them the more I realize I'd probably shut down on day two and just be trying really hard to fake excitement.

4. Writing extroverted characters.
Extroverts don't always find it easy to understand introverts, but the same is true the other way around.  Extroverts are confusing.  Are they social butterflies who are loud and outgoing at all times?  Or are they like us, just...more excited about social events?  Now I did a blog post about the care and keeping of extroverts a while back, but it's one thing to know one in real life and another thing entirely to create one.  I can understand the thought processes of an internal processing, introverted, and generally hedgehog-like character.  The bouncy, people-loving, life of the party?  Not so much.  It's hard to wrap my brain around the fact that being by yourself can drain your energy, and that someone might actually REALLY REALLY ENJOY the writing convention I decided not to attend.  They don't just to go parties because there's food, and they don't instantly make friends with the cat.  Although if you're like a certain extrovert I know, the second an animal comes into view they must talk to it for a few minutes...at least.

And when it comes to writing, well, lets just say that sending an extrovert on a solo trek across an empty desert may not go so well.  Neither would hiding out for long periods of time, or moving to a new location and not having many friends.  Although extroverts tend to remedy that pretty quickly....

SEE THIS IS WHY IT'S HARD!

5. Promoting yourself.
I don't know about you, but I'm rubbish at promoting my skills.  It involves talking to people, being the center of attention for a moment on at least a small scale, and coming up with reasons why people should focus on you.  All of which are absolute torture.  This can apply to writing, music, or anything that involves self-promotion, and it is the one thing about publishing a book that I am REALLY not looking forward to.

6. Telling people about your writing.
This kind of goes along with the last point.  While I love it when people want to hear about what I write, the fact that I actually have to tell them is...well, it's a bit intimidating.  Verbal communication has never been my strong point, which is partly why I have this blog, so when I try to talk to someone about what I've written, things go a bit pear-shaped.  I've mentioned this once or twice before in previous blog posts, but I feel like it's worth mentioning again and again.

And then, when you've been sitting there for two hours and you're only halfway through the story, you suddenly realize that you may in fact be really boring that person.  So you stop.  And then you think, but wait, should I stop?  or should I finish the story?  But that's got more to do with anxiety than introversion.




So there you have it.  I hope you can relate to this as much as I can (being as I made the list...it would be pretty sad if I made a list I couldn't actually relate to at all...).  Let me know in the comments if there's anything I missed!

Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Daily Quote Challenge (or: I'VE BEEN TAGGED IN A POST, GUYS!!!)

Hello!  It is the last day of May!  And I've been tagged in a post by the fabulous Maggie @ Maggie's Musings!  Aaaaaand I'm bending the rules.  Which is something I NEVER DO so watch out world here I come.

The Daily Quote Challenge -- What you're supposed to do.
1. Thank the person who nominated you.
2. Tag three new bloggers every day.
3. Post one quote on your blog every day for three consecutive days.

The Daily Quote Challenge -- What I'm doing.
1. Thanking the person who nominated me.
2. Tagging....some bloggers?
3. Posting a bunch of quotes here because why the heck not.


So first things first: Thank you Maggie, you amazing unicorn and generally cool person!

(this is the point in the story where Grace realizes that the steps are out of order and has a crisis because while she can completely rework the rules for the challenge she cannot follow a numbered list in the WRONG ORDER because that would be a crime to all of humanity.  THREE DOES NOT COME BEFORE TWO)

Have I ever mentioned that I'm weird?

Okay, so here are the quotes.  I'm combining this challenge with something Faith @ Genuine Perplexities did, where she described herself with various internet things.  So basically I'm posting a bunch of quotes that are important to me.





So there you have it!

Quotes that I like.  

Now to tag.

This is the problem with having a whopping total of four friends and only two of them blog.
Not only that but Maggie's already done the post, and tagged Faith.  So.  I highly doubt people will see this but here goes.  

Cait @ Paper Fury
Hannah @ Hannah Heath


And that's it.  Can I tag Faith and Maggie again? Nope.  So basically if you want to do this post, consider yourself tagged, say that I tagged you, and make the post. 

That's it!  Grace out.









Sunday, May 28, 2017

What I've Been Reading -- May 2017

YES!  IT IS HERE!  THE BOOK POST!
These will be happening at the end of each month.  It won't have ALL the books I've read each month, but two or three I pick out as either being my favorites, or the ones I'd like to talk about.  These books will probably not be current, I'm not doing anything like reviewing the hot new summer novels, or whatever.  This is just what I've been up to.  I'll put in my own opinions, and a quote or two from the book.  By all means use this list and my opinions when looking for something to read, or completely disregard it.  I don't care.

And that being said, let's get on with it!




East of Eden
John Steinbeck

I loved this book, and Steinbeck in general.  It follows the lives of a few families, and connects them all in an intricate web.  One of the reasons I like this author is because his characters are extremely true-to-life, and this book absolutely DOES NOT FAIL MY STANDARDS.  Forget Of Mice and Men and The Grapes of Wrath, this is my favorite Steinbeck book as of yet.  His wording and descriptions are beautiful, I never fail to get a perfect image of his world in my head, and every character has it's ups and downs.  In fact my favorite thing about this book is that it's often hard to tell which characters are "good" and which are "evil".  Seen through Steinbeck's starkly realist point of view, each one is well-developed, and each one makes good and bad decisions.  While it is on the longer side, I would absolutely recommend this book to anyone.

"Humans are caught -- in their lives, in their thoughts, in their hungers and ambitions, and in their kindness and generosity too -- in a net of good and evil.  I think this is the only story we have and that it occurs on all levels of feeling and intelligence.  Virtue and vice were warp and woof of our first consciousness, and they will be the fabric of our last, and this despite any chances we may impose of field and river and mountain, on economy and manners.  There is no other story.  A man, after he has brushed off the dust and chips of his life, will have left only the hard, clean questions: Was it good or was it evil?  Have I done well -- or ill?"




The Picture of Dorian Gray
Oscar Wilde

This book wasn't bad.  I was fairly hesitant starting out, the book doesn't open in a particularly exciting way, but once you get past the first chapter or so things begin to pick up.  While the book as a whole isn't something I would read again, the character development was EXCELLENT, and without a doubt the best part of the whole thing.  Dorian Gray's character in particular was very well done, but his good friend wasn't neglected by any means.  In fact, I think his friend, Lord Henry, was a more interesting character than Dorian, despite Dorian being the one going through the greatest changes.  While I wouldn't recommend this book to everyone, if you enjoy Jane Austen or the Bronte sisters, you will probably want to add this one to your list.

"All I want to do now is look at life.  You may come and look at it with me, if you care to."

"One has a right to judge of a man by the effect he has over his friends."




All the Light We Cannot See
Anthony Doerr

This is the first book I've read in a while that's given me a solid book hangover.  I have a slight weakness for books set during WWII, but after reading this book I'm almost afraid to read others like it, in case this one spoiled me.  The author added a lot of science to the story -- one of the characters is interested in radio, the other in seashells -- but instead of bogging it down, it made the characters and the events so much more interesting, and added meaning to things about those characters that I never would have thought of on my own.  The structure of the book is unique as well, and something I did not expect at all.  The story almost works backwards.  That's the best I can do, it's incredibly hard to explain the layout of this book.  All I can say is it's magnificent.  I would recommend it to anyone, but be warned, you will feel things.

"Stones are just stones and rain is just rain and misfortune is just bad luck."

"He is being loyal.  He is being what everybody agrees is good.  And yet every time he wakes and buttons his tunic, he feels he is betraying something."

"Open your eyes and see what you can with them before they close forever."



So there you have it!  My three books from this month.  What have you been reading?  Let me know in the comments!  I'd also love your recommendations, if you want to give them to me.


Thursday, May 25, 2017

You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Strong Female Lead

Welcome to the sixth "You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your ___________"!
Yes this is late.  I'm not terribly sorry.

Maggie at Maggie's Musings helped me brainstorm this post!  She's really awesome, you should check out her blog.

Strong female leads:  In all honesty, out of all the tropes I've done so far this one is the least bad, in my opinion.  Yeah, it's full of stereotypes and overused in the name of feminism, but the concept is good.  I'm all for women having as many great and glorious adventures as men.

So if they're not that bad at all (and even good), what is it about them that I don't like?

One: girl is an emotionless abyss.
See, people have this idea that if a girl is strong, SHE HAS NO EMOTIONS.  None.  Zero.  Zilch.  Nada.  This is either because things have happened to her which have made her try to cut them off, or because she doesn't understand them because that's just who she is as a person.  And if she does have emotions, they come in the form of ONE MASSIVE BREAKDOWN WHICH POSSIBLY RUINS EVERYTHING AND CONFUSES A LOT OF PEOPLE.
*cue ugly crying*
The problem with this cliche is it just isn't true.  While there are girls who don't have strong emotions and solve problems logically, there are lots of other girls who are on the other side of the picture and are extremely emotionally driven.  And then there's girls like me, who are in the middle, and let their heart and their head work together to solve problems.  Instead of girls being really mysterious and feeling nothing, LET THEM FEEL THINGS!  Make logical characters, but make emotional characters too!  And make characters who can never decide anything because their heart tells them one thing and their head tells them another and their intuition is telling everything else to just SHUT UP AND LISTEN ALREADY I AM HERE but yet they don't follow their gut and then everything goes haywire!

That was a run-on sentence about my brain.

Writing me as a main character would be an absolute nightmare.


Two: girl is good at everything but insecure.
I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THIS COMING UP EVERYWHERE!!!!!!!  
*stunningly gorgeous girl and stunningly handsome guy are talking*
Girl: I'm so uglyyyyy....
Boy: No!  You're beautiful!
Girl: No I'm not, I'm ugly!  Don't lie to me!

Girl: I can't shoot a bow and arrow!  I have such bad aim!
Boy: Here, try this one!
*girl hits every target ever and also an apple on the rooftop of a house in Spain despite her being in America*

Girl: I can't lead, I can't fight, I can't cook, I can't make speeches, I can't stand up for what I believe in.........
*girl leads entire army into battle and wins on the first try*

So yeah.  This is waaaaay too common and needs to stop.  Maybe it's true that there are people who have talents they don't know about or don't recognize, but REALLY?  EVERY SINGLE GIRL IN EVERY BOOK IS UNWITTINGLY GOOD AT EVERYTHING!  It's really getting on my nerves.  Can I shoot a bow and arrow on the first try?  No!  Can I lead an entire army into battle with terrible leadership skills?  No!  

(also about the bow and arrow: why is it that's all girl's ever use as weapons?  why can't I see a girl wielding a sword as big as she is, forged from the blood of her enemies?)


Three: girl is pretty (but not too pretty).
Lest we mistake her for a movie star or a toad, it must be specified that she is NOT UGLY, but she is NOT DROP DEAD GORGEOUS EITHER.  Nope.  Always the happy medium.  Always floating right in between, a happy cloud of not-too-prettiness.  I guess this is because we can't have ugly main characters, but we also can't have characters that look better than our readers because that's not normal.  Even though we know the actress that plays her in the film is going to be 839,294,000% better looking than all of us lowly worms.

Oh, and we always get this information while she's looking at a mirror contemplating her life and pitiful destiny.  You know, that scene in the first chapter of the book where she talks about her ordinary life and is thrown into a tumultuous plot immediately afterwards?  Yeah.  That scene.  


Four: girl is the one telling the story.
Now I've got nothing against first person present tense.  

BUT WHY ARE THEY ALL LIKE THAT???????

I'm not joking.  It feels like every book I've read with a "strong female lead" has the girl telling the story as it happens.  Why can't we have a different perspective some of the time?  WHYYYYY!??!?


Five: girl is caught in a love triangle.
This is just like, standard, factory-made stuff now.  Of course there's a love triangle.  Why wouldn't there be?  It's like making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich with no jelly.  

And it makes me SO FRUSTRATED!  I don't care about her love life!  STOP KISSING ALREADY AND FIGHT YOUR STUPID REVOLUTION THAT YOU STARTED!  I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR BOYFRIENDS!  NOBODY ELSE DOES EITHER!

For a further rant on this topic please see a previous post.  There will be a link at the end of this one.


Six: girl wears fitting, figure-enhancing clothing.
Granted, this is much more prevalent in films than in novels.  It still frustrates me, though.  In my opinion, the only times it's okay to give a girl a form-fitting, skimpy outfit are:
1. If there are also men in tight-fitting outfits and it's for a purpose.
2. If her job has something specifically to do with wearing clothing like that.
3. If her character is the type of person who would enjoy wearing that kind of clothing.

Star Wars has done a FANTASTIC job with practical clothing:

Jynn Erso from Rogue One

Captain Phasma from The Force Awakens

You see that armor?  You see how it looks almost identical to the rest of the Stormtroopers' armor?  It's just on a woman.  That's it.  Everything else is the same.  It's not hard to figure out.  And it's much more practical.  Instead of a skintight leather suit, or armor that only covers the midsection, try FULL ARMOR, or try loose, flexible clothing.  


So there's my rant.
If you know of any YA books that throw away these cliches, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IN THE COMMENTS!  I would love to read them. 


The Love Triangle Post (and the first one in this series):
You Want to Go Home and Rethink Your Love Triangle

Saturday, May 20, 2017

Working Through My TBR: Is the Way I Read Weird? WHO CAN TELL????!!!!!!

So now that school's over for the year, I have the mental energy to dive into my very long To Be Read list.  I don't have a physical pile, because I'm getting them from the library, but I do have a very very very long list.  Considering I only started the actual list a few months ago.

A few things I have accomplished since the end of the school year:
1. FINISHED THE BOOK THAT TOOK ME THREE FREAKING MONTHS TO READ!
2. Read a whole book in an evening.
3. Put a massive pile of books on hold at the library.


Which brings me to the bulk of the blog post:

How I Read Books

I read a little weirdly, according to some people I have spoken to on the subject.  

How, you ask?

I stress read.

Yep.  I stress read.  Sort of.  Like, I enjoy reading and find it relaxing (although I'm usually a pretty chill person anyway so it's just more relaxing which can end in and in fact has ended in sleep), but I don't often feel particularly motivated to read unless I have A MASSIVE PILE OF BOOKS STARING ME DOWN AND DARING ME TO FINISH THAT ONE AND MOVE ON TO THE NEXT.

This is partly why I started the whole "read some books and blog about them" thing, which I haven't actually done.  It starts this month, though.  Officially.  Because I've actually done enough reading to justify writing about it.

But anyway, unless the book is really good and COMPLETELY SUCKS ME IN, I often don't read it unless I HAVE TO in order to move on to the next one.  Because if I read more than one book at once the world will collapse inward and kill us all.


There's also anticipation that goes along with that whole massive pile of books thing.  I want to read them AAAAAAALLLLLLL but I have to finish the one I'm on first.  I imagine Belle often feels the same way.


Anyway, I thought it would be fun to make a little survey, because surveys are fun, and see how y'all read things.